<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Complexity on Michael Barrow</title><link>https://blog.barrow.me/tags/complexity/</link><description>Recent content in Complexity on Michael Barrow</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Michael Barrow</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 09:30:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.barrow.me/tags/complexity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Who says that IT has to be complicated?</title><link>https://blog.barrow.me/posts/who-says-that-it-has-to-be-complicated/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 09:30:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://blog.barrow.me/posts/who-says-that-it-has-to-be-complicated/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If there were one, single maxim for the IT industry, it is: &amp;ldquo;The only constant is change.&amp;rdquo; Surely, anyone who has spent more than a few days in this business could figure that out on their own. However, I have noticed that a lot of the change is due to an inexplicable movement towards increased complexity disguised as innovation. This is &amp;ndash; to put it bluntly &amp;ndash; complete idiocy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>